Metatron Launch Watch

Launches / Sealslab SlabVault (vault)

Sealslab SlabVault (vault)

Robinhood Chain · 0x778e66f6eb1e2afdedf96a2ece2a479b7f2e896b

Non-token contract · Created Oct 14, 2026 1:08 AM PT · Scanned Oct 15, 2026 12:05 PM PT at block 89460973

53
ELEVATED risk signals
10 checks ran · 0 unknown

Top signal: Shared hosting overlap (+25). At scan time sealslab.xyz resolved to 187.127.98.242, a single server (Hostinger, AS47583). 6 other project sites on the Launch Watch hosting watchlist resolved to the same IP: Sluicebox, Dripyard, Pawnhood, Hoptrail, Swardbow, Markup Machine. Shared hosting is common; this is an infrastructure overlap, not evidence of common ownership or wrongdoing.

Name and symbol are as reported by the contract itself; anyone can deploy a token with any name. This page is about the contract at the address above only, not about any other project with a similar name.

Evidence links

Every check

Score is 0-100; higher means more risk signals. "unknown" means the check could not run with free public data at scan time; it adds 3 points so missing data never looks safe. Each row links to the source used.

StatusPointsCheckEvidence
info0Contract code present
23161 bytes of runtime code.
eth_getCode @ block 89460973 explorer: address 0x778e…896b
pass0Source verified
Verified on Sourcify and Blockscout as SlabVault. Sourcify: exact_match; Blockscout: verified.
Sourcify explorer: source code
pass0Proxy / upgradeability
No EIP-1967 impl/beacon slot set, not an EIP-1167 clone, Sourcify proxyResolution isProxy=false.
eth_getStorageAt slots 1967 impl/admin/beacon @ 89460973
risk signal+8Owner / admin
owner() = 0x1ecef14ddd33ce14114af557d2b108438fe44efc, a plain wallet (no code): one key controls owner-only functions.
eth_call 0x778e66f6eb1e2afdedf96a2ece2a479b7f2e896b owner() @ 89460973 explorer: address 0x1ece…4efc
risk signal+5withdraw/rescue function present
Found withdraw/rescue function(s): withdraw(uint256) 0x2e1a7d4d [runtime bytecode], withdrawInfra(address) [verified ABI].
Sourcify explorer: address 0x778e…896b
info0Contracts deployed by this wallet
1 live contract(s) created directly by 0x1ecef14ddd33ce14114af557d2b108438fe44efc (CREATE nonce scan 0..13); tokens launched via factories are not counted. Wallet nonce = 14.
explorer: address 0x1ece…4efc explorer: tx 0x1261…d151 explorer: address 0x778e…896b
risk signal+6Deployer wallet age
Oldest transaction of 0x1ecef14ddd33ce14114af557d2b108438fe44efc on Blockscout: block 88210005 (2026-10-14 08:05 UTC), 1.5 days before scan.
explorer: address 0x1ece…4efc explorer: tx 0x1261…d151 explorer: tx 0x5738…e3c5 Blockscout API
risk signal+25Site hosting overlap
At scan time sealslab.xyz resolved to 187.127.98.242, a single server (Hostinger, AS47583). 6 other project sites on the Launch Watch hosting watchlist resolved to the same IP: Sluicebox, Dripyard, Pawnhood, Hoptrail, Swardbow, Markup Machine. Shared hosting is common; this is an infrastructure overlap, not evidence of common ownership or wrongdoing.
DNS lookup (Google DoH) ipinfo (IP owner)
risk signal+5Domain age
sealslab.xyz registered 2026-10-13 (2 days ago).
RDAP domain record
risk signal+4Launch X account age
X account created 2026-10-14 (1.5 days before scan).
X post

How this score adds up

Owner / admin (risk signal)+8
withdraw/rescue function present (risk signal)+5
Deployer wallet age (risk signal)+6
Site hosting overlap (risk signal)+25
Domain age (risk signal)+5
Launch X account age (risk signal)+4
Total (capped at 100)53
All scoring weights (scorer v0.2.0)
RulePoints when flagged
not_contract40
unverified15
unverified_template_match4
upgradeable_proxy15
proxy_admin_eoa5
owner_eoa8
owner_contract3
fn_mint12
fn_blacklist12
fn_pause8
fn_fee_setter8
fn_withdraw5
fn_upgrade10
fn_trading_switch6
honeypot35
high_tax10
goplus_flag8
same_creator_honeypot15
low_liquidity10
very_low_liquidity15
no_pool6
lp_unlocked12
launcher_holds_supply10
holder_concentration10
fresh_deployer8
serial_deployer8
young_deployer6
hosting_cluster25
hosting_cluster_subnet8
young_domain5
young_x_account4
any check unknown3
privileged-function points when owner() is 0x0/deadx0.5

See the methodology for what each rule means.

Is this your project? On-chain state changes after a scan. Claim this page: request a re-scan, badge or review
Opens a prefilled GitHub issue (public; never post vulnerabilities there). Free re-scans and corrections; $50 Verified badge or $150 24-hour review. Or email metatron@mail.grokbot.com.